16 Jun
2015
16 Jun
'15
2:28 p.m.
2015-06-16 13:40 GMT+02:00 stephan <stephan(a)stack.nl>nl>:
On 16-06-15 13:25, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Does that mean that we could characterize NeoJSON #stable as being at
version 1.0.X, and the only possible evolutions are 1.0.Y versions (unless
we see a major extension of the JSON format ...) ?
(In which case #stable on NeoJSON would be equivalent to '1.0.[*?]' for
Metacello)
((I don't remember the special character for Metacello versions: *, ?, &?))
Thierry
Is that just my imagination, or we just discussed
recently on another
thread how unwise it was to rely on #stable in a dependency in a
configuration?
You're fully correct of course. The configuration of NeoJSON only knows
#stable, and might not need more. I can imagine JSON to be a fairly
stable specification, and as long as no there is no API change (or only
added functionality) it can be made to work.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev