18 May
2015
18 May
'15
10:53 p.m.
Hi Cyril,
It does not look that different. Something I may recommend, is that Pillar should be
effective at writing other things than a book. So, the chapter decomposition should not be
forced.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On May 4, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Cyril Ferlicot
<cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on the way we manage the input files and the output files.
The way we manage the files now makes hard some improvement of Pillar.
That's why with Damien we though about makes some changes. The changes
are big so I wanted to talk about that with you.
We propose to have always 1 file with all the work inside. That can
use the inputFile tag. For example:
"${inputFile:Chapter1.pillar}$
${inputFile:Chapter2.pillar}$
${inputFile:Chapter3.pillar}$
${inputFile:Chapter4.pillar}$"
And the option "separateOutputFiles" will now create 1 file each time
we have a new Chapter. (!Level 1 header).
That will make simpler the way to number everything and to create
anchor because those 2 doesn't work well with the "separateOutputFile"
option.
What do you thing? That would be good with you?
--
Cheers
Cyril Ferlicot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev