It does not look that different. Something I may recommend, is that Pillar should be effective at writing other things than a book. So, the chapter decomposition should not be forced.
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On May 4, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Cyril Ferlicot
cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm currently working on the way we manage the input files and the output files.
> The way we manage the files now makes hard some improvement of Pillar.
> That's why with Damien we though about makes some changes. The changes
> are big so I wanted to talk about that with you.
> We propose to have always 1 file with all the work inside. That can
> use the inputFile tag. For example:
>
> "${inputFile:Chapter1.pillar}$
>
> ${inputFile:Chapter2.pillar}$
>
> ${inputFile:Chapter3.pillar}$
>
> ${inputFile:Chapter4.pillar}$"
>
> And the option "separateOutputFiles" will now create 1 file each time
> we have a new Chapter. (!Level 1 header).
> That will make simpler the way to number everything and to create
> anchor because those 2 doesn't work well with the "separateOutputFile"
> option.
>
> What do you thing? That would be good with you?
>
> --
> Cheers
> Cyril Ferlicot
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev