13 Nov
2011
13 Nov
'11
10:25 p.m.
Hi,
On 13 Nov 2011, at 22:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I do not understand the moose process.
What is so difficult to understand? Anytime we can, we load the latest development version
(or default how we called it first). If one is not provided, we load some version, like in
the case of Merlin.
If we cannot control how fixes get introduced in the
system and the only solution is to fork then I will fork
but this is suboptimal.
Ok I will do it then.
I do not understand.
Doru
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
We have absolutely no support for branching other
than using a separate Monticello repository and handling the branched code manually.
It worked reasonably well until now.
I will stress it again. We do need better configuration support, but we need effort spent
in this direction, too :).
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Nov 2011, at 16:23, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi
this is still totally unclear to me how I can change Moose and get my changes not
breaking parts of moose that I do not know
or are not loaded?
I want to work on the importer/extractor proposal I sent around last week.
So I can implement the changes but what is the process?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"To utilize feedback, you first have to acquire it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev