2014-11-26 12:24 GMT+01:00 Jan B. <bliznjan(a)fit.cvut.cz>cz>:
Hi
Well, that's not the first time I hear that I should try to avoid symbols
in
interface and calls outside my class, I'm just not yet sure why is that.
Might it be refactoring, which would not change names in symbols?
Yes, and a search like "users of" or "references to " (
SystemNavigation
default browseAllCallsOnClass:PNGReadWriter )
Can not find code where the class name is constructed with string
concatenation.
Anyway, there is version without them...
export: method replaced by asPNG, asBMP etc. and without constructing class
names
http://www.mediafire.com/download/htnazneiizll539/DCTRCanvasExporter02.st
Jan
Nicolai Hess wrote
2014-11-18 13:51 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba <
tudor@
>:
I did not get a chance of going over it. Anyone
else?
We need a resolution this week so that we can release next week.
which one, the DCTRCanvasExporter?
I didn't test the code, just looked at the source.
It looks good and I like the scaleToMorphLimits
What I don't like is the
"construct-class-name-from-image-extension-name":
Smalltalk at: (imageFormatUC , 'ReadWriter') asSymbol
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/RTPNGExporter-review-needed-tp4789868p4792320.html
Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev