28 Dec
2018
28 Dec
'18
7:58 p.m.
i don’t know enough to to rezound much more than
a critic who never read the book . ie cliff notes tool bound
it just looks really powerful and all the words like cool do sound
no doubt it makes a lot of( other )languages jealous enough to
route
and do some gremlin’s pout i may or may not have heard about not
quite sure in redoubt
winjing why should they get this gold they’re goofy and we’re out in
the speed cold n unsouled
we can’t image ine it why should it even exist if not existing then it
shall not blind or be missed
apon this even being true don’t look at me I’m asking you it’s pure :
what a poverty of mind
just spin up some images and to thy text files be kind no
offense to emacs bind
but i know nothing i don’t know a thing
and it makes me really really want to get this latest click moose bling
with all the stuffing puffing and the kaboose thing
and stripped Pharo’s unglamorous to thy skript loosed to clamour us
and cut it loose in styled
and every minute I’m not doing this makes me feel a most silly goose
unlawfully beguiled
and i do protest I’m gonna be a silly goose for too longa this silly
while
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 05:04 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
--
www.feenk.com
"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
On Dec 28, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Kjell Godo
<squeaklist(a)gmail.com> wrote:
WOW
:)
What part of it do you like?
Cheers,
Doru
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:57 Tudor Girba
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Luke,
I am happy this looks exciting :).
About the confusion part: The Glamorous Toolkit we are working on right
now is a
complete new world built on a complete new graphical stack that
does is not based on the existing stack that ships with Pharo. It is not an
evolution. It is a leap.
The goal of the new GT is to propose a completely reshaped programming
experience
that enables moldable development. You will find the concepts
from the old GT in the new world as well. For example, the Inspector is
extensible in similar ways and the API is similar as well.
But, in the new world, we are bringing the concept much further. For
example,
Documenter provides a whole new kind of a tool that can mold to
unify multiple workflows (like data notebooks, code documentation, or
tutorials) right in the IDE. Coder provides the infrastructure for
manipulating code that can mold its shape as you type. Transcript allows
you to embed various widgets to transform the otherwise dull experience of
a console into a live one.
Behind the scenes GT comes with several engines. The Examples engine
enables
example-driven development which also bridges the gap between
testing and documentation effort, especially when combined with Documenter.
Releaser is able to release deeply nested projects. Phlow offers an engine
that shares similarities with Glamour. Completer provides moldable
completion. Visualizer offers a couple of visualization engines such as
Mondrian.
All of these are possible because of the underlying graphical stack made
of
Sparta/Bloc/Brick.
All in all, we believe that the new GT enables a new way of programming.
Individual features can be attractive, but our goal is to reshape the
development experience.
Does this address the concern?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Luke Gorrie <luke(a)snabb.co> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 05:13, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
wrote:
> Please do let us know what you think .. and,
of course, what you feel.
>
> I'm feeling excited and confused :).
>
> Excited because I love seeing all these new demos streaming out and
I'm
itching to put new capabilities to work.
>
> Confused about the roadmap. How does this "new" Glamorous Toolkit
relate to the "old" one that I learned about last year from the Moldable
Tools thesis? Is this a new version or a complete rewrite? Is it backwards
compatible or completely reimagined? Is adopting the new version a seamless
process or is porting required? Are frameworks like Glamour still there
behind the scenes or were they replaced? etc.
>
>
>
<gt-documenter-magic-markup.gif><gt-0-4-0.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev
mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.feenk.com
"Things happen when they happen,
not when you talk about them happening."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev