21 Oct
2008
21 Oct
'08
4:06 p.m.
Good we are making progress!
Stef
On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
The convention is that the meta-description is added only to the
getter. The rationale is that you always need a getter, but you don't
always need a setter.
Cheers,
Doru
On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
do I have to put it also for the setBelongsto
do you distinguish setter and getter?
simon I fixed some belongsTo implementors.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi Stef,
Take a look at: FAMIXNamedEntity>>belongsTo
Doru
On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
ok
> The Moose Finder relies on the Fame descriptions.
>
> It is just that we will have two such descriptions, one for
> belongsTo
> and one for container. They can both be followed. So, I would say
> this
> is not really an issue.
Then I have to metadescribed belongsTO ?
<MSE: ><derived>
?
can you tell me what is the magic incantation ?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"We are all great at making mistakes."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev