Hi Udo,
I will try to reread your questions soon, but right now I am drowning in work;
however based on some of your questions (related to modeling, visualizations), you might be interested also in OpenPonk ( https://openponk.github.io/ ), E.g. we have several different models (simple state machines, business modeling, software modeling (based on Moose' FAMIX)), with visualizations, validations, etc. This can be installed on top of Moose, so you can use it in complement. One of OpenPonk ideas is to provide a more supportive environment for custom models and working with them; the project is still in quite infant phase, but we are slowly advancing. :) Your use case certainly sounds like something that could greatly benefit from Pharo and tools and frameworks around (Moose, OpenPonk, Roassal, Grafoscopio, ...), so I will back to this when I stop drowning. :)
Peter
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 02:14:24PM +0100, Udo Schneider wrote:
Hi Offray,
I just started to play around with it and hit some issues? Where to report them best?
Use the fossil repo for Grafoscopio, at http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/ticket http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/ticketWill do.
And thanks for the clarification on MD/pandoc. I have not yet decided which route to follow. On the one Hand I’m very comfortable using Pillar - esp. because most of it is “in-image”. On the other hand I can imagine my coworkers already know MD - so this might be the easier route.
Best Regards,
Udo
On 30 Dec 2016, at 15:09, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas offray.luna@mutabit.com wrote:
Hi,
On 29/12/16 07:31, Udo Schneider wrote:
Hi Offray,
Install it from the Pharo catalog, because I'm having problems with ConfigurationOfGrafoscopio now (seems that I'm not using the proper repo).
Yepp - discovered this the hard way :-)
Sorry. I will fix it soon. This are slow days for family and friends at the end of year, but I'll let you know as soon as is fixed.
I just started to play around with it and hit some issues? Where to report them best?
Use the fossil repo for Grafoscopio, at http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/ticket
Just a general question: What was the reason to go for markdown/pandoc as opposed to Pillar?
I was using pandoc before for writing my PhD thesis before (now I have migrated to LaTeX) with the key advantage of using of @keywords for Zotero bibliography integration and I need compatibility with my own past :-). Also markdown is widely spread compared to Pillar, with scholar efforts to use it, like scholmd [1][2] and a wider community of current practitioners. Pandoc is a strong suite for working with markdown and extending it, covering most writing needs, including footnotes, academic bibliography support (which is poorly or not covered at all in most markup languages), importing and exporting to several formats (as you can see on [3] at bottom) and possibilities to hack it with several languages via Abstract Syntax Trees using JSON exchange language[4]. By supporting Pandoc I think I will cover my own needs for academic writing in several scenarios and compel a wider audience of present and future researchers, as key population for Grafoscopio.
[1] http://scholmd.org/ [2] http://scholmd.org/basic_setup/what-is-scholarly-markdown.html [3] http://pandoc.org/ [4] http://pandoc.org/scripting.html
Cheers,
Offray
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev