3 Dec
2007
3 Dec
'07
10:52 p.m.
Hi,
We always mapped Java packages on FAMIXNamespaces. Namespaces can be
nested. Like Johan said, FAMIXNamespace should be used for entities
that provide name scoping. We never used the FAMIXPackage until now
for Java, but I like the suggestion of Johan to map jar files on them.
Why do you say that you would want to map Java Package on
FAMIXPackage? Only to reuse implementation, or are there other reasons?
As for modeling references, I think I start to like the solution of
Hani and Adrian to have a Container superclass and to put all these
transitive methods in there.
Cheers,
Doru
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi the list
could you react on this email?
Because the question of transitive relationship is important.
Stef
On 27 nov. 07, at 15:29, Hani ABDEEN wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
Hi all,
in the attachement you find what it seems to be a solution to what
you ask Stephane:<navigationSolution.pdf>no?
bests
hani
On Nov 26, 2007, at 14:58 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On 26 nov. 07, at 09:09, Johan Brichau wrote:
Hi all,
In the importer I wrote, I have the following mappings:
* Java packages -> Famix namespaces (Simply because java packages
have control over name scoping).
* Java jar files -> Famix packages (it's the closest thing that
corresponds to any 'packaging' thing in Java).
I think it's strange to map Java packages onto Famix packages..
Just my 2 cents ;-)
Oops. I think that I would like to be much clever and know the
answer. It seems that
I will start to work on package and see how it goes. I have the
impression that from a
scenario point of view, I want to see how a class refer/is
referenced
by other classes.
and this also at the level of the packages. so the scoping of the
container is important
now this would push me to put java package into namespace but to
analyse I would like the
inverse.
So please help me.
Stef
Johan
ps: I will be looking at using the existing Eclipse importer
directly
from JavaConnect/Penumbra too.
On 25 Nov 2007, at 16:25, Toon Verwaest wrote:
>> I thought about it and I would like to have
>>
>> java package -> extracted as package
>> smalltalk package -> as package
>> smalltalk namespace -> as namespace
>>
>> Is it what you had in mind?
>
> I don't necessarily think that package equals namespace in Java
> either. There are the same amount of namespaces as packages, but
> unlike packages, the namespaces are not nested, right?
>
> Well on the other hand, namespaces are obviously deducable from
> java
> packages, so I guess it makes sense to just have packages and
> write
> code to get the namespace info (which is more or less important
> because package belongsTo != namespace belongsTo for java).
>
> What is your opinion about the matter?
> @Sandro: get involved , this concerns you too, obviously :)
>
----------------------------
Johan Brichau
johan.brichau(a)uclouvain.be
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev