Yes, that's a know limitation at the moment. The problem is that it
is not so much code generation but more META which is affected by
this, but it is on my todo list. For the moment, I can only ask you
to workaround this by not using subpackages.
cheers,
AA
On 22 May 2007, at 10:10 , sellossa(a)ensieta.fr wrote:
thank you for your answer.
By the way, did you see the problem that occurs when the
BasicCodeGenerator is used to generate code from a model that
contain a
package with subpackages ?
thanks
Sara
> Hey sara,
>
> that are the meta-annotations that META uses to build des metamodel
> for the classes. See for example FAMIXMethod, or any other famix
> class, to learn how this is used.
>
> Also you may find some slides on my website
>
>
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~akuhn/Documents/Slides/2006-Moose-
> GoingMeta.pdf
>
> cheers,
> AA
>
> On 21 May 2007, at 14:28 , sellossa(a)ensieta.fr wrote:
>
>> hi!
>>
>> I am still working on the code generator in Moose.
>> With the BasicCodeGenerator class, you generate a metamodelling
>> protocol
>> for each attribute of a EMOF class
>> What is the use of these "metamodel methods" ?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Sara
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev