Jannik rang the alarm bell. We are slower than in January ( 1600 nodes
=> 28 ms, 300 edges => 35919 ms), but we have a slightly better test
coverage.
I will dig into it.
Report produced on 2010-04-06T09:37:41+00:00
Benchmark ManyNode (simple rendering of nodes) :
100 nodes => 4 ms
200 nodes => 8 ms
300 nodes => 10 ms
400 nodes => 14 ms
500 nodes => 17 ms
600 nodes => 22 ms
700 nodes => 25 ms
800 nodes => 27 ms
900 nodes => 31 ms
1000 nodes => 35 ms
1600 nodes => 55 ms
Benchmark ManyEdges (simple rendering of edges) :
10 edges => 2 ms
20 edges => 10 ms
30 edges => 24 ms
40 edges => 45 ms
50 edges => 99 ms
60 edges => 142 ms
70 edges => 205 ms
80 edges => 402 ms
90 edges => 552 ms
100 edges => 744 ms
200 edges => 12463 ms
300 edges => 134138 ms
60.6 % of methods are covered
Progress from last time: +5.82 %
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.