16 May
2011
16 May
'11
10:10 a.m.
By the way, there is still one important issue to make RPackage work
correctly:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3974&q=RPackage&col…
I think this is something to do with Pharo. So I guess that any change would
not be integrated in the version of pharo you are using for moose ?
2011/5/16 Cyrille Delaunay <cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com>
What I did recently is to clean , write tests and
debug (in particular the
problem highlighted in the moose mailing list).
We kept an older version as 'stable' for Moose (that should work also
correctly), but maybe we should push the last changes we made ?
2011/5/15 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
Hi,
I lost track of what happened with RPackage. Cyrille, Stef, could you
summarize the status?
I see that the tests are working on 1.2 (except for the expected failing
ones). Is it good enough to rely on it for the release? If yes, we release
tomorrow.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev