23 Oct
2014
23 Oct
'14
9:37 p.m.
hi Doru,
haa yes I understand now ! Yes it should be the same complexity as we
traverse
each line twice =).
Thanks !!
Pierre
2014-10-23 16:04 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>om>:
Hi Pierre,
You pretty much doing the same thing as I said only in the reverse order.
My idea was to do a normal flow layout with top alignment and traverse
again each line and shift the nodes to the bottom.
But, your algorithm has about the same complexity, so it should be quite
fine.
Cheers,
Doru
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Pierre CHANSON <chans.pierre(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I am sorry Doru but in fact I did not well
understood what you meant by
"shift the smaller boxes",
But I finally changed the solution, as another problem came with this
first solution: as I put the last element at 0:0 position then the
positions to the fist element are in negative x and y.
So now I browse the elements in the normal order, I just pre-compute the
next line to get the next line biggest element height before creating the
line. Not a miracle solution but it works.
thanks !!
pierre
2014-10-23 15:32 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>om>:
Hi Pierre!
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I agree with Doru, the layout should remain the same. Maybe we could
have a look at your algorithm next week, but it is doable.
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Le 23-10-2014 à 10:26, Pierre CHANSON
<chans.pierre(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
hello !
thank you Doru, the thing is the max width is not based on number of
elements but
their size in pixel so we can't predict what will be the
elements (and so the biggest element height) in the next line so, as a
reversed align top, I put the elements from the bottom right corner to the
top left. (Just put the elements in the reverse order) The last line is the
fist one and less filled. But there is certainly a simple trick to fix
this. What about the extra step to move at the end ?
yes I will take a look at the center aligned version, I thought this
one was
already working but with a closer look, it's not :)
Pierre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev