30 Mar
2010
30 Mar
'10
10:40 a.m.
Hi Simon,
Hmm, but then I am not sure I understand how it could be done better.
The goal of the Configuration is to allow one to load the code stand
alone. So, SmallDude extends FAMIX and Group, so it needs Famix-Core
and Moose-Core.
Maybe we should rethink packaging? How would you do it?
Cheers,
Doru
On 30 Mar 2010, at 00:10, Simon Denier wrote:
I just noticed that ConfigOfSmallDude declares an
explicit
dependency on two packages, Moose-Core and Famix-Core. I don't think
it's good practice, as it could lead to conflict between a version
of Moose and a version of SmallDude requiring different package
versions.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."