Hi Simon,
Hmm, but then I am not sure I understand how it could be done better. The goal of the Configuration is to allow one to load the code stand alone. So, SmallDude extends FAMIX and Group, so it needs Famix-Core and Moose-Core.
Maybe we should rethink packaging? How would you do it?
Cheers, Doru
On 30 Mar 2010, at 00:10, Simon Denier wrote:
I just noticed that ConfigOfSmallDude declares an explicit dependency on two packages, Moose-Core and Famix-Core. I don't think it's good practice, as it could lead to conflict between a version of Moose and a version of SmallDude requiring different package versions.
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."