Hi,
On 2 Jun 2012, at 00:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
shouldn't view be bound to an instance of ROMondrianViewBuilder rather than to ROView?
I think not. My idea was that the GLMMondrianEasel will be switched to the ROMondrianViewBuilder when it will work. Like this we can edit at both levels.
Or maybe we find another solution? Maybe we can just offer both view variables in the same Easel?
Maybe having view and roView. What would be a good name for the instance of ROView?
How about view and rawView?
Doru
Alexandre
Cheers, Alexandre
On Jun 1, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Roassal add "Roassal Easel" as an item in the root of the World menu. However, this is a rather primitive Easel.
In Glamour, there already exists an Easel similar to the Mondrian one. I now added all these editors in the Moose menu.
In the Moose image, I would prefer to not have the default Roassal easel in the World menu, because it increases confusion. Perhaps one idea would be to move it into Tools (like PetitParser does).
Alex, what do you say?
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"We can create beautiful models in a vacuum. But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."