15 Aug
2007
15 Aug
'07
9:03 a.m.
thank you Adrian
Indeed, It could be useful for my application.
Sara
Hi Sara,
for some unfortunate reason, the mapping between Smalltalk namespaces
and model packages is not 1:1. One of the exceptions is that all
SCG.Moose.FAMIX* classes are modeled using FAMIX.* meta-descriptions.
If this is a real problem for your application, I can fix that tomorrow.
cheers,
AA
On 14 Aug 2007, at 21:04 , sellossa(a)ensieta.fr wrote:
Hi Adrian!
I get something weird when I use it for SCG.Moose.
When I do:
|package|
SCG.Moose asMetaDescription classes.
package:=SCG.Moose asMetaDescription inspect.
package doesn't contain the entites FAMIXClass, FAMIXAttribute and
so on...
However, FAMIX entites are defined in the namespace SCG.Moose,
isn't it?
Thanks you for your help
Sara
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev