22 Oct
2014
22 Oct
'14
10:46 a.m.
Hello Anne,
I'm using FAMIX-SQL too. About the retrocomapatibility there should not be
any problem: First, I agree with Doru. Second, I did a version not long ago
(version 2.1) that points to the current version of the model and the
importer so it should be always possible to go back to the current status
to make old code working, so go ahead and let me know if you want to
discuss some changes.
Cheers,
Fabrizio
2014-10-22 10:39 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>om>:
Hi,
I am using it, but feel free to change it. Being backward compatible with
a broken model is not particularly useful in the long run :).
Thanks for doing that.
Cheers,
Doru
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Anne Etien <anne.etien(a)univ-lille1.fr>
wrote:
Hi,
With Olivier, we are working on FAMIX-SQL. There are some things with
which we disagree (usage of table or column name instead of directly the
object, foreign keys only reference tables but through the sourceColumn
message…). So we would like to know if someone uses FAMIX-SQL or if we can
modify and restructure it. With the modifications, it will be difficult to
be retro compatible.
Thanks in advance.
Olivier and Anne
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev