19 Oct
2007
19 Oct
'07
10:06 a.m.
This was mainly just a mail to stir things up :).
Yet, I still remember asking myself when I came to Bern, why is a
class not a structural thing. And given that all subclasses describe
different types of what we call variables, one possibility is to name
the superclass accordingly.
Doru
On Oct 19, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
A Girbasonian neologism :)
whereas "structural-" and "behavioural-" are used terms in
modelling,
compare eg to UML's StructuralFeature and BehavioralFeature.
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Obvious things are difficult to teach."
To open the discussion, I vote to rename
StructuralEntity to
VariableEntity :).
why? What is a variableEntity?