6 Mar
2014
6 Mar
'14
3:28 p.m.
Hi!
As you have seen, Roassal offers way to define arrows. Here is a short example:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| v s e1 e2 l |
v := ROView new.
s := ROEllipse new size: 15.
e1 := s element.
e2 := s element.
e1 @ RODraggable.
e2 @ RODraggable.
e2 translateBy: 50 @ 80.
l := (ROLine new add: (ROArrow new size: 10)) elementFrom: e1 to: e2.
v add: e1; add: e2; add: l.
v open
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You can always create a new array by subclassing ROArrow or ROLineDecoration.
Alexandre
On Mar 6, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Anne Etien <anne.etien(a)univ-lille1.fr> wrote:
Hi,
We are currently making some visualizations of application with Usman. They rely on
method invocations. In that case, it is better to know which method invokes which other
one. We put arrow on our graph, but the only available arrow we found are 'UML like
inheritance' arrow with big triangle. Would it be possible to have other type of arrow
that are more discrete, but nevertheless indicates the sense? (If possible put acute and
not obtuse angle between the two branches of the arrow, it is more easier to see when they
are lot of links).
More over, would it be possible to have hook on the lines to transform them as broken
lines. Indeed, when you have m1 linked to m2 and m2 linked to m1, there is superposition
of the two links so not easy to read. It would be great if we can manually break the lines
to see the two of them.
I put some examples of arrow below.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Anne
<images.jpg><images.jpg>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
