3 Jul
2016
3 Jul
'16
12:56 p.m.
Hi,
On Jul 3, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Stephan Eggermont
<stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
On 02-05-16 14:05, Tudor Girba wrote:
I still do not see where this was proven so. We manage the GT configuration like this
since quite some time and it worked until now better than with groups.
Could you be more specific?
Cheers,
Doru
Hi,
Thanks.
However, please let’s redo this. I do not want to have groups in the
ConfigurationOfMoose. I know some people have a different, but groups are difficult to
manage, and in our case, we certainly need explicit artifacts that should be modeled with
configurations.
The problem is that nothing we have now provides an alternative for groups
and the situation with many configurations and no groups has shown to be
a lot worse. We need first-class groups Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."