15 Nov
2013
15 Nov
'13
8:09 a.m.
Well,
We could discuss about it, also with Alex, for example.
One thing which is possible is to subclass the builder and extend it with new features,
such that the original code will be consistent with its behavior.
Cheers,
Roby
On Nov 15, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Ok. I might give it a try but that will imply that some of the existing code will have a
different behavior because it is too restrictive in the way it is now.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch> wrote:
Hi Doru,
Happy that you played with my ROTreeMapBuilder!
I’d be interested to extend it, but not anytime soon.
At the moment the tree map builder suits my needs and I am focusing on using it on my
data ;)
Cheers,
Roby
On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I played a bit with the ROTreeMapBuilder, and there are two things that came to mind and
that would be nice to extend. I opened some issues:
- Support for multiple types of nodes.
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1002
- Default weight should be 1.
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1003
- Circular treemap
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1004
@Roberto: Would you be interested in working on something like this?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev