19 Jan
2015
19 Jan
'15
8 p.m.
Yes, I agree. This is on our todo.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Jan 19, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Tudor Girba
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
I strongly believe that the concrete implementation that links Roassal to the data format
should be moved to a separate package and ideally, to another configuration.
The generic engine should be decoupled from concrete data sources.
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
It should yes
Roassal2 now depends on NeoJSON by the way.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jan 19, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Sven Van
Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote:
Is this in the latest moose 5.1 build ?
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev