13 Nov
2011
13 Nov
'11
10:27 p.m.
I do not understand. This was a todo for me to know that I should document the discussions
that went around when we worked on FAMIX. Why is this an issue?
Doru
On 13 Nov 2011, at 22:11, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Ok since I do not know the conventions and I guess
nobody except you knows them I will not write about them in my document.
Entry closed.
Stef
On Nov 13, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Obvious things are difficult to teach."
It means that I would like to tell people how the
names of the instance variables in FAMIX should be read. For example, if we have an
association from Class to Method, then the instance variable in class is named
"methods". Things like this.
Doru
On 13 Nov 2011, at 20:20, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi
in http://www.themoosebook.org/book/internals/famix/core/overview
there is todo
naming convention for attributes
what does it means?
naming convention for classes, package, methods, attributes?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev