21 Nov
2008
21 Nov
'08
1:45 p.m.
Indeed, I think those would be better.
Cheers,
Doru
On Nov 21, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Obvious things are difficult to teach."
Yes, this is correct.
I think in the case of Fame it makes some sense to have it like this,
because from the Fame point of view multivalued is but an optional
property of the property.
But, where do you need to interpret these pragmas?
no yet.
adrian proposed
Would
that be fine with you:
<FM3Property:type:>
<FM3Property:type:multivalued:>
<FM3Property:type:opposite:>
<FM3Property:type:opposite:multivalued:>
<FM3Property:type:derived:>
<FM3Property:type:multivalued:derived:>
<FM3Property:type:opposite:derived:>
<FM3Property:type:opposite:multivalued:derived:>
???
Cheers,
Doru
On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I suppose that the following list of pragmas
means that I have a
collection of behavior entities
Is is correct?
<MSEProperty: #candidates type: #FAMIXBehaviouralEntity opposite:
#incomingInvocations> <multivalued>
Now it means that I cannot interpret the first pragma in isolation?
I not sure I like that design
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting
is the right one."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev