Indeed, I think those would be better.
Cheers, Doru
On Nov 21, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Yes, this is correct.
I think in the case of Fame it makes some sense to have it like this, because from the Fame point of view multivalued is but an optional property of the property.
But, where do you need to interpret these pragmas?
no yet. adrian proposed
Would that be fine with you:
FM3Property:type: FM3Property:type:multivalued: FM3Property:type:opposite: FM3Property:type:opposite:multivalued: FM3Property:type:derived: FM3Property:type:multivalued:derived: FM3Property:type:opposite:derived: FM3Property:type:opposite:multivalued:derived:
???
Cheers, Doru
On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I suppose that the following list of pragmas means that I have a collection of behavior entities Is is correct?
<MSEProperty: #candidates type: #FAMIXBehaviouralEntity opposite: #incomingInvocations> <multivalued>
Now it means that I cannot interpret the first pragma in isolation? I not sure I like that design
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Obvious things are difficult to teach."