On Nov 13, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
On 13 Nov 2011, at 22:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I do not understand the moose process.
What is so difficult to understand? Anytime we can, we load the latest development version (or default how we called it first). If one is not provided, we load some version, like in the case of Merlin.
with merlin this is not the latest since we have to modify the configurationOfMerlin to point to the latest version. But anyway
If we cannot control how fixes get introduced in the system and the only solution is to fork then I will fork but this is suboptimal. Ok I will do it then.
I do not understand.
since the release cycle of Moose is long and since people use the latest version of Moose it means that this is difficult to introduce large changes. This is probably ok because it forces you to get a working system but if I do a change that touches several packages and one of them does not get loaded or merged then we are in a mess. This is what I mean by how fixes get introduced. In pharo we can **always** rollback in a couple of minutes! Just removing one line in a file and publishing it and we are safe and nobody gets impacted. In Moose no way we can do that. So this is more stress for committers so less people will improve the core.
Stef