this is true that variableEntity would be better than structuralEntity
stef
On 19 oct. 07, at 10:06, Tudor Girba wrote:
This was mainly just a mail to stir things up :).
Yet, I still remember asking myself when I came to Bern, why is a class not a structural thing. And given that all subclasses describe different types of what we call variables, one possibility is to name the superclass accordingly.
Doru
On Oct 19, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
To open the discussion, I vote to rename StructuralEntity to VariableEntity :).
why? What is a variableEntity?
A Girbasonian neologism :) whereas "structural-" and "behavioural-" are used terms in modelling, compare eg to UML's StructuralFeature and BehavioralFeature.
AA _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Obvious things are difficult to teach."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev