13 Mar
2014
13 Mar
'14
2:23 p.m.
Hi Alex,
I think by Moose you mean FAMIX :). But, Moose is no longer FAMIX. FAMIX is
there only for convenience for some use cases.
Moose is now the engines. This is what makes the platform with which we
reinvent programming. I said a year ago that Moose will become the IDE. And
we are almost there. We still need a couple of extra tools like a Coder,
but we can already affect development significantly with the debugger,
inspector and playground.
If you want, Moose is the engine with which humane assessment becomes a
reality :).
Actually, if you just want an image with just the engines, you can get it
in the gtoolkit image:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/gtoolkit/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/gtoolki…
Doru
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
remember that
Moose is a "data Analysis platform" it is not only for
software, so yes
somebody not working with software can use it.
I know, but actually, I am finding myself using the moose image
essentially for GTInspector and Playground. Much more than moose itself.
The Moose image is offering something else in addition to Moose, and I
think we should embrace this better.
Alexandre
I have no particular objection to change the name except that changing
name means
you restart from scratch and have to re-explain to people what
it is ...
nicolas
On 13/03/2014 13:46, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The Moose image offers much more than offering moose. For example, I
have a
postdoc working on Astronomy images and she is using the moose image
not because of moose, but because of what is shipped with it.
>
> Does something who is not interested in analyzing software may find the
moose
image useful? The answer is absolutely yes.
>
> What about changing the name of the Moose image into something closer
to what
it really offer?
Maybe
Pharo4Modelling ? PharoModellingEdition?
I think this discussion is important.
Cheers,
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev