> remember that Moose is a "data Analysis platform" it is not only for software, so yes somebody not working with software can use it.I know, but actually, I am finding myself using the moose image essentially for GTInspector and Playground. Much more than moose itself. The Moose image is offering something else in addition to Moose, and I think we should embrace this better.
Alexandre
>
> I have no particular objection to change the name except that changing name means you restart from scratch and have to re-explain to people what it is ...
>
> nicolas
>
> On 13/03/2014 13:46, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The Moose image offers much more than offering moose. For example, I have a postdoc working on Astronomy images and she is using the moose image not because of moose, but because of what is shipped with it.
>>
>> Does something who is not interested in analyzing software may find the moose image useful? The answer is absolutely yes.
>>
>> What about changing the name of the Moose image into something closer to what it really offer?
>> Maybe Pharo4Modelling ? PharoModellingEdition?
>>
>> I think this discussion is important.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev