22 Sep
2015
22 Sep
'15
4:44 p.m.
Hi!
Why is there not a method atMethodScope?
I have just added #atMethodScope
defined as:
MooseQueryResult>>atMethodScope
^ self opposites
Looks okay no?
Alexandre
Also, why is there not a atClassScope? Apparently this method is deprecated and one
should use atTypeScope instead. However, a class define a type, but a type does not
necessarily defines a class. It may define an interface. I have the impression that
atTypeScope and atClassScope are both relevant. We could even introduce atInterfaceScope.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.