25 May
2011
25 May
'11
9:53 a.m.
In the meantime, I will write some tests.
Doru
On 25 May 2011, at 09:50, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
We will fix that.
I will generate some bugs :)
Stef
On May 25, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Hi,
On 25 May 2011, at 09:08, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
The issue is like I mentioned before: The Cook API is broken and needs revision. The
larger problem is that we do not have tests that capture the problems.
Cheers,
Doru
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I reported the pyramid.
After there were in my flow so I closed them. Now I can take 10 min on
browsing verveineJ model and produce them. I imagine that somebody
has to use this interface.
I think that we should all think if we want to succeed or not.
I mean yes I can do what I'm told (cyrille), or do my experience
(jannik), or fix mondrian (alex) but
if nobody spend 1 hour to try to analyse a Java project then we will
have bugs.
I do use Moose, and Usman and Andre too.
But we use it to compute metrics, very little to browse source code.
and last time we used it was a month ago (ICSM deadline ...) and we used the version
before changes to the meta-model, the one that worked.
since then we had significant changes to Famix (this is why Jannik asked for a 4.0
release) that left things in an unstable state.
Problem lies somewhere in underestimating the impact of the changes to Famix. It should
probably have been considered a development version so that it is clearer what one was
dealing with. nicolas
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev