3 Apr
2013
3 Apr
'13
8:25 p.m.
It is actually important in the testing. Because testing well a model does not say whether
a visualization can actually be drawn
Alexandre
On Apr 3, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Method's comment says "Simulate the graphical
morph rendering". I do not found it important too.
Jura
2013/4/3 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
I do not know what that is, but it does not sound important at all.
Doru
On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
I forgot to say I am writing about porting of it
into Roassal.
Jura
2013/4/3 Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com>
Hi,
Should I port method MOViewRenderer>>getRenderedForm (and corresponding class
MOMorphPainterVisitor)?
Out of Mondrian it is used just once in DistributionMapExampleTest>>testSample
where it can be easily changed by calling "viewRenderer open delete".
Thanks,
Jura
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev