Great.
Doru
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
We have included this yesterday. The version of RTFlowLayout seems much better now than before. It is usable :-)
Cheers, Alexandre
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Awesome. Where is the code?
Doru
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Pierre CHANSON chans.pierre@gmail.com
wrote:
hello,
just a small up,
align Top: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hlsmiklqefb7cn/screen1.png?dl=0
align Bottom: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7kr3gy4e3gwvvgl/screen2.png?dl=0
align Center: https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmgq8cg0f4p3m6u/screen3.png?dl=0
cheers, Pierre
2014-10-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Pierre CHANSON chans.pierre@gmail.com:
hi Doru,
haa yes I understand now ! Yes it should be the same complexity as we
traverse
each line twice =).
Thanks !!
Pierre
2014-10-23 16:04 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com:
Hi Pierre,
You pretty much doing the same thing as I said only in the reverse
order. My idea was to do a normal flow layout with top alignment and traverse again each line and shift the nodes to the bottom.
But, your algorithm has about the same complexity, so it should be quite
fine.
Cheers, Doru
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Pierre CHANSON chans.pierre@gmail.com
wrote:
I am sorry Doru but in fact I did not well understood what you meant by
"shift the smaller boxes",
But I finally changed the solution, as another problem came with this
first solution: as I put the last element at 0:0 position then the positions to the fist element are in negative x and y.
So now I browse the elements in the normal order, I just pre-compute the
next line to get the next line biggest element height before creating the line. Not a miracle solution but it works.
thanks !!
pierre
2014-10-23 15:32 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com:
Hi Pierre!
I agree with Doru, the layout should remain the same. Maybe we could
have a look at your algorithm next week, but it is doable.
Alexandre
Le 23-10-2014 à 10:26, Pierre CHANSON chans.pierre@gmail.com a
écrit :
hello !
thank you Doru, the thing is the max width is not based on number of
elements but their size in pixel so we can't predict what will be the elements (and so the biggest element height) in the next line so, as a reversed align top, I put the elements from the bottom right corner to the top left. (Just put the elements in the reverse order) The last line is the fist one and less filled. But there is certainly a simple trick to fix this. What about the extra step to move at the end ?
yes I will take a look at the center aligned version, I thought this
one was already working but with a closer look, it's not :)
Pierre
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev