16 Mar
2011
16 Mar
'11
7:42 a.m.
Hi Alex,
This is there for compatibility reasons with older Pharo Collection implementations (there
was a large debate a version or so ago). Now, we can rely on sorted: nicely, so we can
remove sort:.
Cheers,
Doru
On 15 Mar 2011, at 21:10, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
MooseGroup has #sorted: and #sort:
What about keeping just one?
Especially since
MooseGroup>>sort: aBlock
self sorted: aBlock
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."