28 Oct
2014
28 Oct
'14
1:28 p.m.
We have included this yesterday.
The version of RTFlowLayout seems much better now than before. It is usable :-)
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Tudor Girba
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Awesome. Where is the code?
Doru
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Pierre CHANSON <chans.pierre(a)gmail.com> wrote:
hello,
just a small up,
align Top: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hlsmiklqefb7cn/screen1.png?dl=0
align Bottom: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7kr3gy4e3gwvvgl/screen2.png?dl=0
align Center: https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmgq8cg0f4p3m6u/screen3.png?dl=0
cheers,
Pierre
2014-10-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Pierre CHANSON <chans.pierre(a)gmail.com>om>:
hi Doru,
haa yes I understand now ! Yes it should be the same complexity as we traverse
each line twice =).
Thanks !!
Pierre
2014-10-23 16:04 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>om>:
Hi Pierre,
You pretty much doing the same thing as I said only in the reverse order. My idea was to
do a normal flow layout with top alignment and traverse again each line and shift the
nodes to the bottom.
But, your algorithm has about the same complexity, so it should be quite fine.
Cheers,
Doru
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Pierre CHANSON <chans.pierre(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am sorry Doru but in fact I did not well understood what you meant by "shift the
smaller boxes",
But I finally changed the solution, as another problem came with this first solution: as
I put the last element at 0:0 position then the positions to the fist element are in
negative x and y.
So now I browse the elements in the normal order, I just pre-compute the next line to get
the next line biggest element height before creating the line. Not a miracle solution but
it works.
thanks !!
pierre
2014-10-23 15:32 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>om>:
Hi Pierre!
I agree with Doru, the layout should remain the same. Maybe we could have a look at your
algorithm next week, but it is doable.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Le 23-10-2014 à 10:26, Pierre CHANSON
<chans.pierre(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
hello !
thank you Doru, the thing is the max width is not based on number of elements but their
size in pixel so we can't predict what will be the elements (and so the biggest
element height) in the next line so, as a reversed align top, I put the elements from the
bottom right corner to the top left. (Just put the elements in the reverse order) The last
line is the fist one and less filled. But there is certainly a simple trick to fix this.
What about the extra step to move at the end ?
yes I will take a look at the center aligned version, I thought this one was already
working but with a closer look, it's not :)
Pierre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev