I have an impression that we could create class AbstractBuilder or ProtoBuilder where we could have all the methods which all builders should understand. For example addElementOn:, addElementsOn:, view, view:, etc. I think it could be useful documentation for someone who wants to create new builder.
It could be also useful if someone decide to compose builders.
What do you thing? Does it have sense? Cheers, Jura
El 21-04-2014, a las 18:24, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com escribió:
But, you should give it a try to extend the inspector for your own needs :). For example, let's play with what would be needed for debugging a view. What do you say?
The inspector could be aware of the builder. This is something what has to be well oiled to support nice demos. We will work on this on some point. FYI, we have extended the GTInspector to support different visualization of the tallies. We will announce it soon.
Alexandre
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote: Hi!
Doru, would it make sense to have RTBuilder>>build returns the view? Like that, there is no need of the last line in:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | b | b := RTGraphBuilder new. … b build. b view -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexandre
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev