Hello Doru,
While porting the VW version of the lattice construction algos, the most adequate representation for VW data structures was provided by Mondrian so I used it. Now, I'll place them in Moose-Algos-Graph... Ok for the tests. I'll start creating them now. I'll commit another version in the evening.
thanx Usman
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
I looked a bit more. The code from Lattice and LatticeNode depends on the logic of Mondrian. This should best be replaced with code that exists in Moose-Algos-Graph.
In the meantime I also created the Moose-Tests-Algos-FormalConceptAnalysis package and added it to the configuration.
Cheers, Doru
On 19 Oct 2011, at 22:36, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Usman,
Please read this email. You just committed another version that broke the
build :)
I fixed it again.
Cheers, Doru
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com Subject: fca should not depend on mondrian Date: 19 October 2011 21:23:09 CEST To: Moose-dev Moose Dev moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
Hi Usman,
I saw that you added the port code to the MooseAlgos repo. Thanks.
Now, during your changes, you inherited the Lattice and the Node from
MONode.
This caused Moose to be unloadable and it is wrong from two points of
view:
- MONode is not meant to be inherited at all. You are supposed to use
Mondrian as a transformation from your domain into the internal Mondrian model.
- MooseAlgos is a basic set of algorithms with no dependencies.
Mondrian is higher level. Thus, MooseAlgos cannot depend on Mondrian.
For these reasons, I now removed the inheritance from MONode.
Furthermore, we also need tests for FCA.
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev