So in that case we should rename to two to
mooseName.
Which is also ok for me.
Stef
That is true. We can rename it to mooseName.
Doru
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
> Please do the other way round, kick mooseUniqueName and make
> absoluteFamixName the default. Names are not unique in Moose for
> several reasons. Actually that method should have been removed/
> renamed long time ago, as its name is dangerously misleading...
>
> AA
>
>
>
> On 22 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> absoluteFamixName
>>
>> could we use instead mooseUniqueName and deprecated
>> absoluteFamixName
>> This way we could manupilate classes and famixClass a bit the
>> same
>> way
>>
>> Stef
>> On 22 nov. 07, at 15:49, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> How can I get the moose name of a smalltalk class?
>>> I tried mooseUniqueName
>>>
>>> Point mooseUniqueName
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are
similar."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch