For what it is worth: While I was in Chile last
year Alexandre, Johan
and I designed and (I think) partly implemented an alternative
Mondrian API. The idea was to avoid these multi-argument selectors
(like in the Seaside API) and have it much more composable and
uniform. Not sure what happened with that?
Lukas
On 19 June 2011 14:37, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
On 19 Jun 2011, at 14:33, jannik.laval wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2011, at 14:21 , Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Thank you for the explanation.
>>
>> My pleasure :). But now, let's see if we can make it better. There are two
actions that seem to come out of the discussion:
>> - do a pass over the comments to better reveal that the input collections are
always entities (both behind nodes and behind edges)
>> - reorganize the protocols of ViewRenderer to reveal better the structure of the
API
>>
>> The other thing would be the debugging capabilities.
>>
>> Who would want to work on these? :)
>
> I will do :)
> I will begin to work on Moose, on tuesday.
> I want also to work on DSM.
Great!
Keep us posted. I will open another thread about DSM.
Doru
> Jannik
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>> --
>>
www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We are all great at making mistakes."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch