BTW, very long time ago, I took the Cobol gramar for JavaCC and actually got it to parse
code (I think it was CICS Cobol), ...
It was a pain because COBOL does not exist. There are tons of different specifications
(cobol-59, cobol-64, cobol-72, cobol II, Cobol++) multipied by many proprietary
implementations, ...
The langage in itself is easy to read (after all, it was the goal), but a real pain to
parse.
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba"
<tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
À: "Moose-related development" <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
Envoyé: Mercredi 19 Janvier 2011 08:09:01
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: cobol
Thanks, Michele, I will take a look.
Doru
On 18 Jan 2011, at 20:47, Michele Lanza wrote:
Doru,
the SCG library features a bunch of books I ordered 10 years ago
when we did the Bedag case study. One I would start with was named
something like "Cobol in 24 hours".
Cheers
Michele
On 2011-01-18, at 8:27 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Do any of you know good resources for learning COBOL?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair,
you will end up with a messy haircut."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev