12 Oct
2010
12 Oct
'10
8:26 p.m.
Hi Alex
Most tools expect things to be something more than some empty entities. You just have to
follow tool assumptions sometimes.
For DSM, I already posted a fix for the test:
model := MooseModel new.
model
add: (FAMIXNamespace new name: 'name1');
add: (FAMIXNamespace new name: 'name2');
add: (FAMIXNamespace new name: 'name3').
allActionMorphs := self allActionMorphsIn: model allNamespaces mooseMenu.
For FamixMethod, #allPackages can not be computed because no package are defined in the
stub model. So just add one.
The following raises an error. Is this intended?
| group fClass |
fClass := FAMIXClass new.
group := FAMIXMethodGroup new.
group
add: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'name1'; parentType: fClass);
add: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'name2'; parentType: fClass);
add: (FAMIXMethod new name: 'name3'; parentType: fClass).
group allPackages
allPackages cannot be computed.
On 12 oct. 2010, at 20:04, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
Is it okay to assume that some FAMIX object may leave outside a model?
There is the following method:
DSMCell>>configurationForNamespace
self accesses: (self from mooseModel sourceLanguage = #Smalltalk
ifTrue: [ self from outgoingReferencesTo: self to ]
ifFalse:
[ (self from outgoingReferencesTo: self to) union: (self from accessTo: self to) ]).
...
^ self dependencies
What do you think about adding:
self mooseModel ifNil: [ ^ self dependencies ]
It would make the DSM more robust.
I tried to open a DSM on a namespace group defined as:
group := FAMIXNamespaceGroup new.
group
add: (FAMIXNamespace new name: 'name1');
add: (FAMIXNamespace new name: 'name2');
add: (FAMIXNamespace new name: 'name3').
It raises an error.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon