On Nov 16, 2007, at 23:57 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
On 16 Nov 2007, at 15:35 , Toon Verwaest wrote:
What is the point of above/below in Association?
The only thing I can
think of is an extra abstraction for all those
different types of "from/to" in the subclasses, but in that case the
type and opposite seems very strange so I guess it's
something else?
It is the source code order of invocations (the placement in
association is incorrect, it should be pushed down to Invocation, as
we do not want that for all associations).
I think that such information, in static analysis, is related to one
behavioural entity: a List of ordered invocations --> a
BehaviouralEntity (Method).
So, Adrian, I suggest removing above/below and ensuring that the type
of outgoingAccesses and of outgoingInvocations in BehaviouralEntity
is List (the order should conform the order in the code)
Hani
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev