Yes I guess we could temporarily have something like that. When we ask the
organizer for an unknown package , we could had a line that looks if a
matching category exist in the system. Should I had something like that for
the stable version ?
2011/5/16 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
Hi,
On 16 May 2011, at 10:42, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
Ok I marked the version 3.1 as stable.
It looks good. The latest build is green.
For the issue of no event raising, it depends
what is critical :) In
your moose image, if you create a new category and move a
class inside, it
will raise an error because RPackage do not find a matching package. This
also means that you will not be able to import this category/package in
moose
I understand the implication. Could this not be fixed easily in RPackage by
ensuring that a package is there when adding a class even if it is not
created already?
Cheers,
Doru
2011/5/16 Tudor Girba
<tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
Thanks, Cyrille.
It looks like this issue of no event raising when an empty category is
created
will take a while, but I do not think this is a critical issue.
Regarding the newer RPackage versions. It looks like it should be stable,
and that
the difference comes from bug fixes, right? So, if you say it is
tested, let's mark it as stable. Could you do that?
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 May 2011, at 10:10, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
> By the way, there is still one important issue to make RPackage work
correctly:
>
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3974&q=RPackage&col…
> I think this is something to do with Pharo.
So I guess that any change
would not be integrated in the version of pharo you are
using for moose ?
>
> > 2011/5/16 Cyrille Delaunay
<cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com>
> > What I did recently is to clean , write tests and debug (in particular
the problem highlighted in the moose mailing list).
> We kept an older version as 'stable'
for Moose (that should work also
correctly), but maybe we should push the last
changes we made ?
>
>
> > 2011/5/15 Tudor Girba
<tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
> > Hi,
>
> > I lost track of what
happened with RPackage. Cyrille, Stef, could you
summarize the status?
>
> > I see that the tests are
working on 1.2 (except for the expected
failing ones). Is it good enough to rely on it for the release? If yes, we
release tomorrow.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
>
>
> > --
> >
www.tudorgirba.com
>
> > "From an abstract
enough point of view, any two things are similar."
>
>
>
>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
>
www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Presenting is storytelling."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev