Yes I guess we could temporarily have something like that. When we ask the organizer for an unknown package , we could had a line that looks if a matching category exist in the system. Should I had something like that for the stable version ?

2011/5/16 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com>
Hi,


On 16 May 2011, at 10:42, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:

> Ok I marked the version 3.1 as stable.

It looks good. The latest build is green.

> For the  issue of no event raising, it depends what is critical :) In your moose image, if you create a new category and move a class inside, it will raise an error because RPackage do not find a matching package. This also means that you will not be able to import this category/package in moose

I understand the implication. Could this not be fixed easily in RPackage by ensuring that a package is there when adding a class even if it is not created already?

Cheers,
Doru



> 2011/5/16 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com>
> Thanks, Cyrille.
>
> It looks like this issue of no event raising when an empty category is created will take a while, but I do not think this is a critical issue.
>
> Regarding the newer RPackage versions. It looks like it should be stable, and that the difference comes from bug fixes, right? So, if you say it is tested, let's mark it as stable. Could you do that?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 16 May 2011, at 10:10, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
>
> > By the way, there is still one important issue to make  RPackage work correctly:
> > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3974&q=RPackage&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Milestone%20Difficulty
> > I think this is something to do with Pharo. So I guess that any change would not be integrated in the version of pharo you are using for moose ?
> >
> > 2011/5/16 Cyrille Delaunay <cy.delaunay@gmail.com>
> > What I did recently is to clean , write tests and debug (in particular the problem highlighted in the moose mailing list).
> > We kept an older version as 'stable' for Moose (that should work also correctly), but maybe we should push the last changes we made ?
> >
> >
> > 2011/5/15 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I lost track of what happened with RPackage. Cyrille, Stef, could you summarize the status?
> >
> > I see that the tests are working on 1.2 (except for the expected failing ones). Is it good enough to rely on it for the release? If yes, we release tomorrow.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Presenting is storytelling."


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev