On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis? what is the license of CCI?
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
what model did you extract? inside methods? symbol resolved? because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the code if you wish.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev