28 Sep
2011
28 Sep
'11
8:04 a.m.
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email
We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We
also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis?
what is the license of CCI?
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev what model did you extract?
inside methods?
symbol resolved?
because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi !
Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from C#. We
were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint
complexity after such a short amount of time.
Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share the
code if you wish.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev