15 Nov
2013
15 Nov
'13
7:53 a.m.
Hi,
Ok. I might give it a try but that will imply that some of the existing
code will have a different behavior because it is too restrictive in the
way it is now.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch>wrote;wrote:
Hi Doru,
Happy that you played with my ROTreeMapBuilder!
I’d be interested to extend it, but not anytime soon.
At the moment the tree map builder suits my needs and I am focusing on
using it on my data ;)
Cheers,
Roby
On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Hi,
I played a bit with the ROTreeMapBuilder, and there are two things that
came to
mind and that would be nice to extend. I opened some issues:
- Support for multiple types of nodes.
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1002
- Default weight should be 1.
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1003
- Circular treemap
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1004
@Roberto: Would you be interested in working on something like this?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev