Hi,

Ok. I might give it a try but that will imply that some of the existing code will have a different behavior because it is too restrictive in the way it is now.

Cheers,
Doru


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli@usi.ch> wrote:
Hi Doru,

Happy that you played with my ROTreeMapBuilder!

I’d be interested to extend it, but not anytime soon.
At the moment the tree map builder suits my needs and I am focusing on using it on my data ;)

Cheers,
Roby

On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I played a bit with the ROTreeMapBuilder, and there are two things that came to mind and that would be nice to extend. I opened some issues:
>
> - Support for multiple types of nodes.
> https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1002
>
> - Default weight should be 1.
> https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1003
>
> - Circular treemap
> https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1004
>
> @Roberto: Would you be interested in working on something like this?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"