30 Apr
2016
30 Apr
'16
6:50 p.m.
Hi,
On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D.
<cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Le 30/04/2016 06:35, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal for this
release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible. Would you like to give it a first try?
Cheers,
Doru
Hi,
I would like to release Moose two weeks after Pharo 5 is released (probably next week).
After that, we will move the development to Pharo 6.
Hi Doru,
With the release of Moose 6, at Synectique we would like to improve the
configurations.
Currently we have tools that do not need any in-pharo interface but we
have to load a lot of stuff as Roassal or last version of glamour
because this is impossible to only get Famix.
We would like to be able to load only the core model of Moose with Moose
6. In order to do that we thought that it would be good to have a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore with only the packages needed by Famix and a
ConfigurationOfFamix that would allow us to load only the model of
Moose. With this changes we would be able to have much more modular
projects. It is currently impossible to have famix without Roassal for
example.
What do you think about it?
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev