29 Sep
2011
29 Sep
'11
10:54 a.m.
Ok I got it.
Stef
On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email
We simply extract the class declaration, attributes, methods and their invocations. We
also say whether a method is public or not, whether it is abstract.
Nothing about the AST. Quite simple actually. The CCI looks quite expressive.
But I do not understand how you can do invocations without AST analysis?
what is the license of CCI?
CCI and Mono.Cecil (that we use for VerveineSharp) provide libraries to manipulate MSIL
(i.e. MS byte code), hence these are competing frameworks... since we are working on the
byte code therefore it is not needed to touch AST. Hence, one can go very fast to create
static analyzers with these tools.
Licence: Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL)
From here: http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com/license
Comparison of the two frameworks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6727715/cci-vs-mono-cecil-advantages-and…
+ Mono. Cecil community is much more vibrant ..
Alexandre
On 27 Sep 2011, at 04:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev alex can you reply?
Stef
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev what model did you extract?
inside methods?
symbol resolved?
because get package, class and inheritance should be simple.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Yesterday I spent about 30 minutes with a guy from microsoft to generate .mse from
C#. We were able to extract the data and generate the mse. I was happy to have a blueprint
complexity after such a short amount of time.
>
> Usman, we use http://ccimetadata.codeplex.com for extracting the data. I can share
the code if you wish.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev