28 Oct
2011
28 Oct
'11
8:54 p.m.
We should not.
Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
Cheers,
Doru
On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
It seems this part needs some cleaning up.
why should we have
(isAbstract true)
(isPublic true)
and
(modifiers 'abstract' 'public')
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
De: moose-technology(a)googlecode.com
À: moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43
Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 733 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export
modifiers
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733
public abstract class A { ... }
should appear as
(
(FAMIX.Class
(name 'A')
(modifiers 'public' 'abstract')
)
Similar things should happen to methods and attributes.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev