9 Dec
2015
9 Dec
'15
12:35 a.m.
Are you going to maintain 2 versions of a force based layout? My guess is that the answer
to that is no. I would replace the old one with the optimized version.
On Dec 8, 2015, at 19:29, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Well… If something care about creating a stable and development version. Then sure, why
not…
Alexandre
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
On Dec 8, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Ferlicot D. Cyril
<cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Le 08/12/2015 22:24, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
IMO this is why we have stable/development version for a project. If we
decide that it is stable nobody have to change it and during the
development phase everyone can test it/improve it without problem using
the development version of Roassal.
But this is just my opinion :)
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
So why
create a new class instead of updating the existing one?
Because I have not tested it enough. Moreover, I feel this may impact the continuous
layout one may have.
Inspect the following expression:
RTGeneralExample new forceBasedLayout
The optimized layout may not be efficient here.
Alexandre