Are you going to maintain 2 versions of a force based layout? My guess is that the answer to that is no. I would replace the old one with the optimized version.
On Dec 8, 2015, at 19:29, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Well… If something care about creating a stable and development version. Then sure, why not…
Alexandre
On Dec 8, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Ferlicot D. Cyril cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com wrote:
Le 08/12/2015 22:24, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
So why create a new class instead of updating the existing one?
Because I have not tested it enough. Moreover, I feel this may impact the continuous layout one may have.
Inspect the following expression: RTGeneralExample new forceBasedLayout
The optimized layout may not be efficient here.
Alexandre
IMO this is why we have stable/development version for a project. If we decide that it is stable nobody have to change it and during the development phase everyone can test it/improve it without problem using the development version of Roassal. But this is just my opinion :)
-- Cyril Ferlicot
165 Avenue Bretagne Lille 59000 France
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile