21 May
2010
21 May
'10
7:25 p.m.
Hi Alex,
Thanks. I will then remove the Opax from the ConfigurationOfMoose.
Just a question, which ConfigurationOfXMLParser should we depend on?
The one from the XMLSupport repository, or the one from the
MetacelloRepository. I would prefer the one from the XMLSupport
repository.
Cheers,
Doru
On 21 May 2010, at 19:11, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Opax is now in.
I added a small method called readme in OPOpaxTest. It says what
Opax is for.
I could not understand the class OPOpaxHandlerTestClass.
This class is part of a test scenario. But I cannot easily see a
justification of the method override in it. Maybe the class could be
documented?
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 21 May 2010, at 07:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
Alex,
have you finished to include OPAX ?
Do you need help ?
I planned to do this before Sunday. And it has nothing to do with
lazyness, believe me
Alexandre
Is there something to do for the release ?
With Cyrille, we can do this afternoon the Metacello configuration
for it.
Cheers,
On May 16, 2010, at 23:12 , Alexandre Bergel wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> I was wondering, should OPAX be kept
separated from XMLSupport?
>
> I would be happy if OPAX would get integrated into XMLSupport. I
> think it belongs there. There are a number of things that could
> be added (such as better matching for tags, or various default
> traversals), but I think even as simple as it currently is, it
> still adds to the SAX protocol.
Ok. I will include OPAX in XMLSupport. Just give me a few days.
Alexandre
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev